Interesting. I wrote this in October of 2016. It makes him sound almost like a boy scout now that we all finally have his number!
The time may have come where we should face the reality of our history.
I’ve done lots of reading lately since I cannot stomach the news. I began revisiting my dog-eared copy of Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States, a classic bestseller infamously fought against allowing in the classroom because it’s researched and written from the bottom up. It’s POV and story is from the words of American’s women, factory workers, Native American’s, the working poor, immigrant laborers, etc.
In other words, it’s not our history as recalled by white men in suits.
And it’s a reminder that this country began ugly. What our original settlers did to Native Americans was atrocious. And it remains barbaric. When you build something on rot, lies and savagery, when everyone from Columbus to the Puritans committed genocide under the term of “progress,” you have to ask why we would expect those in power now to be any different? Even the Cubs winning the World Series can’t offset the angst of knowing enough US citizens justified electing a misogynistic, racist, tax-dodging sexist pig as president of our country. It actually makes me wonder how so much positive and humanitarian work actually gets accomplished. But having just “celebrated” Columbus Day and Thanksgiving upon us makes me think it’s time to end these myths.
Let’s start in grammar school classrooms. The truth should be taught, and maybe then our children will begin to understand how important it is to respect others’ resources and people who originate from another country. Maybe they will learn to find ways to live and work together sincerely.
Until then….you perpetuate a myth long enough and it should be no surprise that you elect a reality TV president. This isn’t the White Republican Man’s country in any other way than through coercion. The time has come to stop pretending it is. When you build something on a rotten foundation, you cannot make things right until you fix the foundation.
In 1877 an informal Arizona army surrounded and attacked a peaceful Apache camp, killing and mutilating 144 harmless Apaches, capturing 29 of their children and selling them into slavery in Mexico. Just because. That nugget from The Children of the Camp Grant Massacre is from delanceyplace.com, a site providing daily short excerpts of noteworthy non-fiction content relevant to what’s happening in the world today. We did that in 1877. How many kids know about this before we sit down to celebrate Thanksgiving together?
Isn’t it time to teach the truth? Like our lives depend on it? Come on. Let’s push for the right thing: teaching our children what we did right and what we did wrong. What do we have to lose? And how else do we learn?
I wish I was Meghan Daum. She always writes what I’m thinking and she nailed it again in the LA Times on November 7. Her link is below.
It is a shame we can’t be excited about the prospect of the first woman president. We know Hilary comes with baggage, but experienced and prepared she is. And it’s not like her competitor doesn’t have trunk loads of issues.
I’ve waited my entire adult life for this possibility, and the excitement I and many others feel is buried under the misogyny and insanity of her opponent. She hasn’t had the opportunity to share her qualifications and debate outrageously important issues because the candidate she’s up against has made the process a circus and he’s the biggest clown.
Thirty-some years ago a woman moving up the ranks of any private or public organization was newsworthy. As if somehow being born female makes any of us less qualified to do any job a man does. Especially a white man in a suit. No one fears an intelligent female more. I didn’t get it when I began working, and I still don’t get it now.
But those of us who’ve worked twice as hard for less the salary for decades to prove we are of equal intelligence and ability as any man — we’re holding our collective breath for tomorrow.
It is a big flipping deal if Hillary Clinton becomes our first female president. I cannot overstate how hard it still is for a woman to be recognized equally to a man in an office, a meeting, a boardroom.. That notion is just nuts in the 21st century. And if she wins, our daughters will still have to prove themselves. But hopefully it’ll be a lot easier with that thick glass ceiling.shattered at last.
I hope to pop a bottle of champagne tomorrow with colleagues who’ve shared the battles day in and day out for decades. What an incredible moment in our history that would be.
Last week my post called people who back Donald Trump nasty names. I promised myself long before I wouldn’t do that, but I did and I apologize. I’m certain Trump voters include people I love and will continue to love.
But perhaps you’ll hear me out in these next few paragraphs.
People who choose public service as a career, like politicians, teachers, police and firefighters wake up every morning with a commitment to do something important and meaningful for other people. They are hard jobs that help others and don’t provide great wealth, but they have chosen these jobs because something inside of them compels them to this kind of calling.
Typically, those who run for President of the United States typically have spent decades in public service. We may not agree with their efforts, but they prove their commitment every day by trying to achieve something valuable for a child…
View original post 387 more words
A New York Times headline today says, “Some Donald Trump Voters Warn of Revolution if Hillary Clinton Wins.” You can find it here: http://nyti.ms/2dO9GIY.
Threats of riots, violence—the typical Trump rally activity but conducted nationwide—is apparently what that means. So, along with being really poor losers, can you at least have the courage to admit you’re one or all of the following:
The last one might be tough to swallow, but in every election there’s a winner and a loser and that’s the American way. We choose and if we lose, we compromise. Unless you’re one of the new GOP crew, those with the tolerance of a gnat who think only white men belong not only in power but our only country’s only citizens. White women are, of course, acceptable for reasons Trump has said aloud and I find too disgusting to repeat.
Trying to make Hillary’s…
View original post 248 more words
For years, Wells Fargo Bank has knowingly ripped off its customers. The NY Times has done an awesome job of covering the crime. Those who have paid for their wrongdoing and those who haven’t are demonstrations of Democracy At Work—ha! It’s
time to end the insanity. If you’ve got an account at Wells Fargo, pull it. Who cares if it’s $100. It adds up if we all do it, consumers stop putting up with the absurdity and our messages are heard. That’s how this whole democracy thing got started.
On October 12 Michael Corkeryprovided this great timeline:
ANATOMY OF A SCANDAL
For years, Wells Fargo set up sham accounts without customers’ consent.
The Scandal Breaks
The practice of creating phony accounts under relentless sales pressure was first reported in 2013 by The Los Angeles Times.
In September 2016, the illegal practices cost Wells Fargo $185 million in fines. The bank fired at least 5,300 mostly low-level employees.
“They warned us about this type of behavior and said, ‘You must report it,’ but the reality was that people had to meet their goals,” said a former worker. “They needed a paycheck.”
“These are the people who have been left holding the bag,” said a lawyer for the workers.
“Everybody knew there was fraud going on, and the people trying to flag it were the ones who got in trouble,” said an ex-branch manager who was fired.
Stumpf Steps Down
NY Times article on Wells Fargo insanity.
But things really don’t change unless consumers change. Get mad. Do something. What the Financial and Banking industries are getting away with are beyond criminal. The least we can do is stop working with them.
CPS Teachers Asked to Take 7% Pay Cut—Bound to attract the Finest
First, here’s a 2016 Chicago Public School Library:
The unused library at Paderewski Elementary. CPS has 160 librarians for 661 schools, according to the Chicago Teachers Union. DNAinfo/Chloe Riley
CHICAGO — Leaders of a national organization of librarians are bemoaning cuts in Chicago schools that they say “makes it impossible for CPS to achieve its mission of preparing all students for success.”There are 218 librarians in 178 CPS schools, meaning 36 percent of schools have dedicated librarians,” according to Emily Bittner, CPS spokeswoman….I mean, really, why would reading or access to reading material be a priority to a HUGE public school system? (Question added by me.)
On top of that
For many who don’t understand the history of the great Chicago Public School teacher rip-off, here’s an excellent article written by Will Caskey. It is a six-minute read, worth every second. PLEASE take six minutes and process how insignificant our children’s education’s are to the powers-that-be in Chicago politics and understand why they MUST be voted into oblivion.
The Truth About the CPS Pension Fight
To understand why the Chicago Teachers Union is threatening to strike — and why Mayor Rahm Emanuel is lecturing them — you need to go back three decades in time.
But let’s start with the 2015–16 school year. Chicago Public Schools were definitely broke. They issued a budget with a mystery $500 million dollar hole. They borrowed and borrowed, to the point that CPS now is maxed out on the public debt market and is forced to issue private debt at exorbitant rates. CPS publicly mused that they might not make their pension deposits. They threatened to cut teacher pay and even to randomly fire teachers.
It was grim. But then Illinois state government came through for CPS, sort of. The Legislature passed a law allowing the school district to raise property taxes by $250 million for pension payments. They also said CPS could keep receiving $70 million in state funds even though fewer students are attending, and that CPS might get another $200 million if the Legislature passes a pension reform bill that meets Gov. Bruce Rauner’s approval.
This level of state funding leaves CPS functional — almost. In order to fill the remaining $200 million hole in the budget though, Mayor Emanuel wants to cut something called the pension pickup.
Basically, The pension pickup is a mechanism by which CPS pays for the employee side of pension contributions, to the tune of 7% of teachers’ salaries. It’s as if your employer started making your entire 401(k) contribution instead of merely matching a percentage of yours. It’s a pretty good deal.
Mayor Emanuel says that eliminating the pension pick-up will make Chicago Teachers Union “part of the solution.” CTU is so infuriated that they are threatening to strike.
And this is where we have to back into history.
Once upon a time, CPS ran out of money, and the Republican governor of Illinois and mayor of Chicago couldn’t agree on how to fix it, and CTU was really mad about it.
Sound familiar? It was in 1979. CPS ran out of money. Then-Gov. Jim Thompson and then-Mayor Jane Byrne blamed each other for the crisis and rejected each other’s plans to fix it.
Then CPS LITERALLY ran out of money and stopped issuing paychecks.
When the dust settled, CPS was placed into financial receivership by a State-created board. Teachers were understandably enraged that there was now no guarantee that they would receive their next paychecks. They also understandably wanted back pay for the time during which they all turned into interns.
To placate angry teachers, it was decided that CPS would make teachers’ pension contributions — in effect, granting teachers a 7% pay hike while buying CPS some extra time to figure out how to fill up the resulting hole in the pension system. Thus, the pension pickup was born.
This was a new twist on a familiar strategy: Chicago and Illinois governments have a long history of awarding future pension benefits instead of pay raises in the present, on the logic that actual pay raises mean spending money right now, while pension increases put off spending money to the indeterminate future.
That was, in technical terms, a truly terrible idea.
Because 7% of $14,459 (a starting teacher’s salary in 1980) didn’t sound like all that much to make up. But over the years, that teacher received annual raises — and probably a few more increases as well, for earning a master’s degree or taking on coaching duties. So by the time that teacher hit retirement, in 2014, the base pay was about $71,000. From then on, the teacher receives 3% annual cost of living adjustments based on salary at retirement.
So here’s the math problem that CPS apparently couldn’t-or wouldn’t-understand in 1979. The pension pick-up for that starting teacher was worth about $1,000 a year, give or take. But by retirement, the value of the pick-up had grown to $5,000 annually. And the 3% cost of living increase (COLA) means that, in 20 years, (through the magic of compounding) the pension pickup will end up costing the pension systems an additional $9,000 — per year, per retiree.
If you want to math it out, that’s $180,000 over an average retirement. It’s a pretty sweet compensation for a paycheck scare during the Carter Administration.
So it makes sense for Mayor Emanuel to ask teachers to start picking up that 7% again. Right?
Well, the problem is that we’re now asking today’s starting teachers to take a 7% pay cut — and keep in mind, the value of that 7% will increase year-by-year over the course of that teacher’s career. A teacher with a bachelor’s degree will lose about $150,000 over his/her career when you factor in contractual raises over thirty years. Teachers with advanced degrees will lose even more.
So Mayor Emanuel is asking today’s novice teachers to accept a pay cut that will accumulate to more than the cost of a bachelor’s degree at a top private school. That’s a gut punch to 20-somethings who are already worried about when, if ever, they will pay off their college loans.
Ah, but Mayor Emanuel says everyone else is chipping in for this, so teachers should as well:
“Chicago taxpayers have stepped up to be part of the solution. The State of Illinois, for the first time, has stepped up to be part of the solution. The [CPS] central bureaucracy, in the sense of the fat, has stepped up to be part of the solution. And I think the teachers should be part of the solution in not only stabilizing their finances, but strengthening our classrooms.”
HAVE Chicago taxpayers stepped up? Official numbers will come out with the Cook County Clerk’s office next year, but a decent estimate of the $250 million property tax increase comes to an additional $284 a year from the average residential property in Chicago. For kicks, let’s assume that the value of that average property will double in that time. So by 2046, the average homeowner will be kicking in an additional $575 a year. That’s about ONE-SIXTH of the amount that a novice teacher will lose THIS YEAR.
It’s true that the original pickup decision was a panicked, thoughtless attempt to triage an insolvent school district. And some people may believe that teachers should simply be paid less.
But there is no rational reason to say that CPS teachers taking a massive pay cut that will add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of their careers makes them part of a fair and equitable solution to the CPS budget disaster.
The solution with minimal impact is pretty simple: raise property taxes more. The Chicago City Council can raise taxes and transfer the funds to CPS; in fact, they already did so for additional school construction funds last year. Raising taxes by another $284 per year for everyone is not pleasant, but it is far less severe than a 7% pay cut for teachers. Seven percent of the median household income in Chicago is $3,300, over five times the size of that total potential property tax increase.
Of course, property taxes have been a third rail in Chicago. Former Mayor Richard M. Daley spent his entire tenure assuring everyone that property taxes would never ever go up. So an entire generation of Chicagoans grew up thinking a property tax increase is an unthinkable, apocalyptic event. This is patently false: even after the City Council’s historic property tax increase last year, Chicago’s effective property tax rate is still below the median in Cook County.
Many people will read this and conclude that Chicago cannot handle another property tax increase. And Chicago politicians are going to listen: Property owners disproportionately vote in municipal elections and Democratic primaries, so they have a lot more influence, even if it isn’t based on facts.
But eliminating the pension pickup won’t make CPS teachers part of the solution.
It will make them pay for prolonging the problem.